Monday 29 December 2014

Reminds me of "Animal Farm".

George Brandis
 George Brandis ordered expensive bottles of Australian wine while dining with an undisclosed number of British arts representatives in London in April. Photograph: Alan Porritt/AAP Image


The attorney general, George Brandis, spent $1,100 of public money on a dinner during an official visit to London, freedom of information documents requested by Labor show.
Fairfax media reported that Brandis, who is also the arts minister, ordered expensive bottles of Australian wine while dining with an undisclosed number of British arts representatives at the Massimo restaurant on 4 April.
The dinner cost £627 ($1,119), of which £228 ($407) was spent on alcohol, the documents show.
Brandis’s office could not be contacted for comment, but earlier defended the cost of the meal to Fairfax.
“It’s usual practice for senior cabinet ministers to host dinners for important stakeholders within their portfolios,” a spokesman said. “On this occasion the attorney general and minister for arts hosted key UK senior arts representatives.”
Labor’s spokesman on waste, Pat Conroy, said on his Facebook page the amount spent was “obscene”, especially as it came just weeks before the tough federal budget in which the government introduced cuts to public spending.
Facebook screenshot of Pat Conroy
 Labor’s spokesman on waste, Pat Conroy, blasted George Brandis’ meal on his Facebook page. Photograph: Facebook
“To spend over $400 of taxpayers’ money on wine is unpardonable, especially at the same time as the government is making people pay more at the doctors and petrol pump,” he told Fairfax.
Brandis paid back nearly $1,700 shortly after coming to office for claiming parliamentary expenses to travel to the 2011 wedding of radio host Michael Smith.
In February, Senate estimates revealed that Brandis spent $15,000 of taxpayers’ money on building a new bookshelf in his ministerial office.
In January 2012, London’s Daily Telegraph gave Massimo a scathing review, saying “such paeans to marble-sanitised vulgarity may be perfect for lobbyists to entertain their prey” but its “mix of the flashy and the desultory had nothing to offer the set-menu diner other than outrageous drinks prices ... confused service and sullen mediocrity”.

Friday 26 December 2014

Magi and Civil Disobedience

"Many Christians are still unsure about Civil Disobedience," writes Craig Greenfield. "That's why this Christmas season we need to learn wisdom and discernment from some of the first people who sought to worship Jesus: a trio of spiritual gurus from Asia. They were the first of many in the New Testament to refuse to obey the ruling authorities."
Greenfield points out that the Magi (popularly but wrongly identified as three in number, because of the gifts cited), after they had paid homage to the infant Christ, were "warned in a dream not to go back to Herod" and "returned to their country by another route" (Matthew 2.8, 12).
"God told them not to obey the ruling authority", he continues. "This was during a time when disobeying the King was a capital offence, punishable by death. It is the first recorded act of civil disobedience in the New Testament.
"Take a moment to reflect on the fact that obeying the King, whose word was the law of the land, would have meant the death of an infant. Later, it meant the death of hundreds of children.
"The law is not our ultimate moral guide. … Slavery was lawful. The holocaust was legal. Segregation was legally sanctioned. Simply put, the law does not dictate our ethics. God does. So it should not surprise us that the One we follow was executed as a criminal, and that there will be times we are called to break unjust laws.
"As St Augustine said, 'An unjust law is no law at all.' Christians cannot fulfill their role in life without coming into conflict with the world system."